https://git.schokokeks.org/derivepassphrase.git/tree/837e57d2ce6c317d5ba483d88baddbdccfae03df Recent commits to derivepassphrase.git (837e57d2ce6c317d5ba483d88baddbdccfae03df) 2024-10-10T12:18:23+02:00 tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/837e57d2ce6c317d5ba483d88baddbdccfae03df Add remaining tests to the storeroom exporter for 100% coverage 2024-10-10T12:18:23+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>Before this commit, certain consistency checks within the storeroom exporter that seemed difficult to test remained untested: a payload size check in the master keys decryption routine, another payload size check in the session keys decryption routine, and object connectivity and type correctness checks in the top-level exporter routine. The master and session keys decryption routines, it turns out, don't need this explicit size check: the `struct` library, used for decoding the payload even further, already checks this automatically. (What *is* needed is a wrapper to convert the exception type, in general, for the whole decryption block.) For the connectivity and type correctness checks in the top-level exporter routine, I generated another couple of broken storeroom configurations (e.g. where directory contents, encoded as a JSON array, contain non-string elements). We now test for each of these configurations if they correctly fail to parse. Finally, it turns out that many of the docstrings reported the ciphertext sizes incorrectly, because they wrongly neglected the padding in their calculations. Fix this, of course. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/2eaaa7f8ace52c29c83e36568417c92b358d9710 Signal and list falsy value cleanup steps that were actually performed 2024-10-09T16:20:12+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>Signal whether cleanup was actually perfomed on the requested object or not, and if yes, list the actual cleanup steps undertaken. When importing a vault configuration on the command-line, issue a warning for each cleaning step. Since the warning messages in both the cleanup steps and the check for non-normalized passphrases report on "paths" in a JSON object, implement a fully general JSONPath formatting function (single item selection from the root only). This harmonizes the warnings output, but also causes changes in the test cases and expected output. Additionally, the JSONPath function name clashes with a common local variable name, necessitating renaming, and control flow for the validation function and the vault configuration import action have changed somewhat; the former to impose a consistent validation order (global first, service-specific next), the latter to avoid extraneous else-branches. As a result of all this, this patch is somewhat larger and less concise than it should be, given the modest magnitude of changes it actually introduces. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/695ac3fd833a1d50ba99f9539d668982bbd2bc00 Manage health checks in centralized hypothesis settings as well 2024-10-08T13:57:21+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>Some of the tests that time out under coverage-based slow instrumentation time out during the data generation phase, not the actual test phase (i.e. trigger health check errors). The root cause is the same, and settings objects cannot be stacked, so amend the standard decorator for slow `hypothesis`-based tests, instead of introducing a new one. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/3eabf0cd303c0e2e83a61a7c7835ee66b7fb5acf Centralize settings for hypothesis deadline management 2024-10-08T11:43:10+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>Our unit tests run in multiple, very different environments, which leads to drastically different execution times, up to a slowdown factor of roughly 40 (test coverage, "timid" Python tracer). The `hypothesis` library however runs timing checks on each of its tests, indepedent of the available processing power and coverage instrumentation. As a result, some benign tests time out under these circumstances regardless. In the past, I've raised their execution deadline in an ad-hoc manner whenever this happens (or fixed the tests, if they weren't so benign). But instead of littering the test suite with one-time adjustments of deadlines, a more sensible approach is to use a test decorator that ensures a common extended deadline for tests that need it, only if they need it (i.e. run under coverage). So do that. (Sadly, because of how the settings decorator works, this must be applied function-wise, and cannot be stacked with other settings decorators.) Finally, if this deadline extension still doesn't help, then this usually means we are generating huge or expensive-to-evaluate inputs. So limit the size of some of the inputs (string length, recursion depth, size of passphrases to derive) to keep execution times better constrained. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/63053f40ef9487c6ede43eb863bbd9abe578e258 Add changelog entry for key/phrase and falsy behavior changes 2024-10-08T10:04:11+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>Document the changes in 7d2f2b1bda31ead428d3c009772aaf3d2261d60c and 798ddc103c6c03835394733aeca128b970aacd06 in the changelog. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/7d2f2b1bda31ead428d3c009772aaf3d2261d60c Align behavior with vault concerning falsy values in config 2024-10-08T09:32:00+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>The original vault(1) sometimes checks only for falsy values (in the JavaScript sense) for its configuration settings. `derivepassphrase` however uses strict type and value checks, and rejects falsy values of the wrong type. This behavior is a visible deviation from vault(1), and shall thus be removed. A new function, `_types.clean_up_falsy_vault_config_values`, normalizes falsy values in a vault configuration to their correct types, in-place. Running this on a potential vault configuration and then calling `_types.is_vault_config` should return the same validity results as vault(1) does. The new handling of falsy values invalidates most of the tests for validation errors, as `None`/`null` was a common way to generate an invalid setting. Instead, keep a master list of vault configurations that is used (perhaps filtered first) for all validation tests, and test the handling of falsy values by generating vault configurations with falsy value replacements from the master list (a custom `hypothesis` strategy). On that note, the existing `_types.validate_vault_config` has proved rather difficult to keep at 100% coverage with the new example vault configurations, because some of the error conditions are triggered elsewhere. Accordingly, instead of treating global and service-specific settings separately and quasi-duplicating all validation checks, unify them into a queue of settings dicts to check, only mildly adjusting for the very few differing keys between them. GitHub: Closes #17. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/798ddc103c6c03835394733aeca128b970aacd06 Align behavior with vault concerning key and phrase in config 2024-10-05T23:30:07+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>When both a key and a passphrase are specified in the vault configuration, vault(1) would unconditionally use the key, *unless* the command-line overrides this choice. `derivepassphrase` however always gave preference to the most "specific" configuration, and would error out if both key and passphrase were specified at the same specificity. While arguably more intuitive, this behavior is a visible deviation from vault(1), and shall thus be removed. Besides two instances of the `test_200_is_vault_config` in `tests.test_derivepassphrase_types`, this also flips the result of `test_205_service_phrase_if_key_in_global_config` in `tests.test_derivepassphrase_cli`. Because that flipped version needs extra mocking infrastructure – the `sign` function – and because that mock function already exists in another test (but local to that test), promote that mock function to global and shift it into the top-level `tests` module. Since we had to update the imports in `tests` anyway, we also purged `dpp.vault...` references in `tests.test_derivepassphrase_cli` in favor of `vault...`. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/59082d1f81b629c4be67bdcce2977db289d7c3af Tell MkDocs to ignore scriv's changelog snippets 2024-10-04T10:55:32+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>The master changelog file is included, of course, but we don't want MkDocs to bother with the single snippets (rendering them, generating warnings that they're not part of the navigation tree, etc.). &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/b0d6fe8ee3208a5c123e546aa931ce06306ad8f6 Update required Python version in the README 2024-10-03T13:40:52+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>This was forgotten while adding Python 3.9 support. &lt;/pre&gt; tag:gitlist.org,2012:commit/7bd5c68e2b3448a44f2b0faeb3025e9974ed3fb6 Relax hypothesis deadline for another slow-ish test 2024-10-03T13:30:36+02:00 Marco Ricci software@the13thletter.info <pre>The vault settings validation test keeps timing out on my older hardware, when running without the C tracer and at moderate power saving settings. I can only presume it would time out similarly on even lower-powered hardware, such as a Raspberry Pi. &lt;/pre&gt;