en/faq.wml (c316b6fc4) - tor-webwml.git

faq.wml

## translation metadata
# Revision: $Revision$
# Translation-Priority: 2-medium

#include "head.wmi" TITLE="Tor FAQ"

<p>General questions:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#WhatIsTor">What is Tor?</a></li>
<li><a href="#Torisdifferent">How is Tor different from other proxies?</a></li>
<li><a href="#CompatibleApplications">What programs can I use with
Tor?</a></li>
<li><a href="#WhyCalledTor">Why is it called Tor?</a></li>
<li><a href="#Backdoor">Is there a backdoor in Tor?</a></li>
<li><a href="#DistributingTor">Can I distribute Tor on my magazine's
CD?</a></li>
<li><a href="#SupportMail">How can I get an answer to my
Tor support mail?</a></li>
<li><a href="#WhySlow">Why is Tor so slow?</a></li>
<li><a href="#Funding">What would The Tor Project do with more
funding?</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Compilation and Installation:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#HowUninstallTor">How do I uninstall Tor?</a></li>
<li><a href="#PGPSigs">What are these "sig" files on the download
page?</a></li>
<li><a href="#CompileTorWindows">How do I compile Tor under Windows?</a></li>
<li><a href="#VirusFalsePositives">Why does my Tor executable appear to
have a virus or spyware?</a></li>
<li><a href="#LiveCD">Is there a LiveCD or other bundle that includes Tor?</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Running Tor:</p>

<p>Running a Tor client:</p>

<p>Running a Tor relay:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#RelayFlexible">How stable does my relay need to be?</a></li>
<li><a href="#ExitPolicies">I'd run a relay, but I don't want to deal
with abuse issues.</a></li>
<li><a href="#RelayOrBridge">Should I be a normal relay or bridge
relay?</a></li>
<li><a href="#WhyNotNamed">Why is my Tor relay not named?</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Running a Tor hidden service:</p>

<p>Anonymity and Security:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#KeyManagement">Tell me about all the keys Tor uses.</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Alternate designs that we don't do (yet):</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#EverybodyARelay">You should make every Tor user be a
relay.</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Abuse</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#Criminals">Doesn't Tor enable criminals to do bad things?</a></li>
<li><a href="#RespondISP">How do I respond to my ISP about my exit
relay?</a></li>
</ul>

<p>For other questions not yet on this version of the FAQ, see the <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ">wiki
FAQ</a> for now.</p>

<hr />

<p>
The name "Tor" can refer to several different components.
</p>

<p>
The Tor software is a program you can run on your computer that helps keep
you safe on the Internet. Tor protects you by bouncing your communications
around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around
the world: it prevents somebody watching your Internet connection from
learning what sites you visit, and it prevents the sites you visit
from learning your physical location. This set of volunteer relays is
called the Tor network. You can read more about how Tor works on the <a
href="<page overview>">overview page</a>.
</p>

<p>
The Tor Project is a non-profit (charity) organization that maintains
and develops the Tor software.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="Torisdifferent"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#Torisdifferent">How is Tor different from other proxies?</a></h3>
<p>
A typical proxy provider sets up a server somewhere on the Internet and allows you to use it to relay your traffic.  This creates a simple, easy to maintain architecture.  The users all enter and leave through the same server.  The provider may charge for use of the proxy, or fund their costs through advertisements on the server.  In the simplest configuration, you don't have to install anything.  You just have to point your browser at their proxy server.  Simple proxy providers are fine solutions if you do not want protections for your privacy and anonymity online and you trust the provider from doing bad things.  Some simple proxy providers use SSL to secure your connection to them.  This may protect you against local eavesdroppers, such as those at a cafe with free wifi Internet.
</p>
<p>
Simple proxy providers also create a single point of failure.  The provider knows who you are and where you browse on the Internet.  They can see your traffic as it passes through their server.  In some cases, they can see your encrypted traffic as they relay it to your banking site or to ecommerce stores.  You have to trust the provider isn't doing any number of things, such as watching your traffic, injecting their own advertisements into your traffic stream, and isn't recording your personal details.
</p>
<p>
Tor passes your traffic through at least 3 different servers before sending it on to the destination.  Tor does not modify, or even know, what you are sending into it.  It merely relays your traffic, completely encrypted through the Tor network and has it pop out somewhere else in the world, completely intact.  The Tor client is required because we assume you trust your local computer.  The Tor client manages the encryption and the path chosen through the network.  The relays located all over the world merely pass encrypted packets between themselves.</p>
<p>
<dl>
<dt>Doesn't the first server see who I am?</dt><dd>Possibly. A bad first of three servers can see encrypted Tor traffic coming from your computer.  It still doesn't know who you are and what you are doing over Tor.  It merely sees "This IP address is using Tor".  Tor is not illegal anywhere in the world, so using Tor by itself is fine.  You are still protected from this node figuring out who you are and where you are going on the Internet.</dd>
<dt>Can't the third server see my traffic?</dt><dd>Possibly.  A bad third of three servers can see the traffic you sent into Tor.  It won't know who sent this traffic.  If you're using encryption, such as visiting a bank or ecommerce website, or encrypted mail connections, etc, it will only know the destination.  It won't be able to see the data inside the traffic stream.  You are still protected from this node figuring out who you are and if using encryption, what data you're sending to the destination.</dd>
</dl>
</p>

<hr />

<a id="CompatibleApplications"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#CompatibleApplications">What programs can
I use with Tor?</a></h3>

<p>
There are two pieces to "Torifying" a program: connection-level anonymity
and application-level anonymity. Connection-level anonymity focuses on
making sure the application's Internet connections get sent through Tor.
This step is normally done by configuring
the program to use your Tor client as a "socks" proxy, but there are
other ways to do it too. For application-level anonymity, you need to
make sure that the information the application sends out doesn't hurt
your privacy. (Even if the connections are being routed through Tor, you
still don't want to include sensitive information like your name.) This
second step needs to be done on a program-by-program basis, which is
why we don't yet recommend very many programs for safe use with Tor.
</p>

<p>
Most of our work so far has focused on the Firefox web browser. The
bundles on the <a href="<page download>">download page</a> automatically
install the <a href="<page torbutton/index>">Torbutton Firefox
extension</a> if you have Firefox installed. As of version 1.2.0,
Torbutton now takes care of a lot of the connection-level and
application-level worries.
</p>

<p>
There are plenty of other programs you can use with Tor,
but we haven't researched the application-level anonymity
issues on them well enough to be able to recommend a safe
configuration. Our wiki has a list of instructions for <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorifyHOWTO">Torifying
specific applications</a>. There's also a <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/SupportPrograms">list
of applications that help you direct your traffic through Tor</a>.
Please add to these lists and help us keep them accurate!
</p>

<hr />

<a id="WhyCalledTor"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#WhyCalledTor">Why is it called Tor?</a></h3>

<p>
Because Tor is the onion routing network. When we were starting the
new next-generation design and implementation of onion routing in
2001-2002, we would tell people we were working on onion routing,
and they would say "Neat. Which one?" Even if onion routing has
become a standard household term, Tor was born out of the actual <a
href="http://www.onion-router.net/">onion routing project</a> run by
the Naval Research Lab.
</p>

<p>
(It's also got a fine translation from German and Turkish.)
</p>

<p>
Note: even though it originally came from an acronym, Tor is not spelled
"TOR". Only the first letter is capitalized. In fact, we can usually
spot people who haven't read any of our website (and have instead learned
everything they know about Tor from news articles) by the fact that they
spell it wrong.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="Backdoor"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#Backdoor">Is there a backdoor in Tor?</a></h3>

<p>
There is absolutely no backdoor in Tor. Nobody has asked us to put one
in, and we know some smart lawyers who say that it's unlikely that anybody
will try to make us add one in our jurisdiction (U.S.). If they do
ask us, we will fight them, and (the lawyers say) probably win.
</p>

<p>
We think that putting a backdoor in Tor would be tremendously
irresponsible to our users, and a bad precedent for security software
in general. If we ever put a deliberate backdoor in our security
software, it would ruin our professional reputations. Nobody would
trust our software ever again &mdash; for excellent reason!
</p>

<p>
But that said, there are still plenty of subtle attacks
people might try. Somebody might impersonate us, or break into our
computers, or something like that. Tor is open source, and you should
always check the source (or at least the diffs since the last release)
for suspicious things. If we (or the distributors) don't give you
source, that's a sure sign something funny might be going on. You
should also check the <a href="<page verifying-signatures>">PGP
signatures</a> on the releases, to make sure nobody messed with the
distribution sites.
</p>

<p>
Also, there might be accidental bugs in Tor that could affect your
anonymity. We periodically find and fix anonymity-related bugs, so make
sure you keep your Tor versions up-to-date.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="DistributingTor"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#DistributingTor">Can I distribute Tor on
my magazine's CD?</a></h3>

<p>
The Tor software is <a href="https://www.fsf.org/">free software</a>. This
means we give you the rights to redistribute the Tor software, either
modified or unmodified, either for a fee or gratis. You don't have to
ask us for specific permission.
</p>

<p>
However, if you want to redistribute the Tor software you must follow our
<a href="<svnsandbox>LICENSE">LICENSE</a>.
Essentially this means that you need to include our LICENSE file along
with whatever part of the Tor software you're distributing.
</p>

<p>
Most people who ask us this question don't want to distribute just the
Tor software, though. They want to distribute the Tor bundles, which
typically include <a href="http://www.privoxy.org/">Privoxy</a>
and <a href="<page vidalia/index>">Vidalia</a>.
You will need to follow the licenses for those programs
as well. Both of them are distributed under the <a
href="https://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html">GNU General
Public License</a>. The simplest way to obey their licenses is to
include the source code for these programs everywhere you include
the bundles themselves. Look for "source" packages on the <a
href="<page vidalia/index>">Vidalia page</a> and the <a
href="http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=11118">Privoxy
download page</a>.
</p>

<p>
Also, you should make sure not to confuse your readers about what Tor is,
who makes it, and what properties it provides (and doesn't provide). See
our <a href="<page trademark-faq>">trademark FAQ</a> for details.
</p>

<p>
Lastly, you should realize that we release new versions of the
Tor software frequently, and sometimes we make backward incompatible
changes. So if you distribute a particular version of the Tor software, it
may not be supported &mdash; or even work &mdash; six months later. This
is a fact of life for all security software under heavy development.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="SupportMail"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#SupportMail">How can I get an answer to my
Tor support mail?</a></h3>

<p>
Many people send the Tor developers mail privately, or send mail to
our internal <a href="<page contact>">lists</a>, with questions about their
specific setup &mdash; they can't get their firewall working right,
they can't configure Privoxy correctly, or so on. Sometimes our
volunteers can answer these mails, but typically they need to spend
most of their time on development tasks that will benefit more people.
This is especially true if your question is already covered in the <a
href="<page documentation>">documentation</a> or on this FAQ. We don't
hate you; we're just busy.
</p>

<p>
So if we don't answer your mail, first check the <a href="<page
documentation>">documentation</a> page, along with this FAQ,
to make sure your question isn't already answered.  Then read <a
href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html">"How to ask
questions the smart way"</a>. If this doesn't help you, note that we
have <a href="<page documentation>#Support">an IRC channel</a> where you
can ask your questions (but if they are still open-ended, ill-formed,
or not about Tor, you likely won't get much help there either). Lastly,
people on the <a href="<page documentation>#MailingLists">or-talk
mailing list</a> may be able to provide some hints for you, if
others have experienced your problems too. Be sure to look over <a
href="http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/">the archives</a> first.
</p>

<p>
Another strategy is to <a href="<page docs/tor-doc-relay>">run a Tor
relay for a while</a>, and/or <a href="<page donate>">donate money</a>
<a href="<page volunteer>">or time</a> to the effort. We're more likely
to pay attention to people who have demonstrated interest and commitment
to giving back to the Tor community.
</p>

<p>
If you find your answer, please stick around on the IRC channel or the
mailing list and answer questions from others.
</p>

<hr />

<p>
There are many reasons why the Tor network is currently slow.
</p>

<p>
Before we answer, though, you should realize that Tor is never going to
be blazing fast. Your traffic is bouncing through volunteers' computers
in various parts of the world, and some bottlenecks and network latency
will always be present. You shouldn't expect to see university-style
bandwidth through Tor.
</p>

<p>
But that doesn't mean that it can't be improved. The current Tor network
is quite small compared to the number of people trying to use it, and
many of these users don't understand or care that Tor can't currently
handle file-sharing traffic load.
</p>

<ul>

<li>
<a href="<page docs/tor-doc-relay>">Configure your Tor to relay traffic
for others</a>. Help make the Tor network large enough that we can handle
all the users who want privacy and security on the Internet.
</li>

<li>
<a href="<page gui/index>">Help us make Tor more usable</a>. We
especially need people to help make it easier to configure your Tor
as a relay. Also, we need help with clear simple documentation to
walk people through setting it up.
</li>

<li>
There are some bottlenecks in the current Tor network. Help us design
experiments to track down and demonstrate where the problems are, and
then we can focus better on fixing them.
</li>

<li>
There are some steps that individuals
can take to improve their Tor performance. <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/FireFoxTorPerf">You
can configure your Firefox to handle Tor better</a>, <a
href="http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/polipo/tor.html">you can use
Polipo with Tor</a>, or you can try <a href="<page download>">upgrading
to the latest version of Tor</a>.  If this works well, please help by
documenting what you did, and letting us know about it.
</li>

<li>
Tor needs some architectural changes too. One important change is to
start providing <a
href="#EverybodyARelay">better
service to people who relay traffic</a>. We're working on this, and
we'll finish faster if we get to spend more time on it.
</li>

<li>
Help do other things so we can do the hard stuff. Please take a moment
to figure out what your skills and interests are, and then <a href="<page
volunteer>">look at our volunteer page</a>.
</li>

<li>
Help find sponsors for Tor. Do you work at a company or government agency
that uses Tor or has a use for Internet privacy, e.g. to browse the
competition's websites discreetly, or to connect back to the home servers
when on the road without revealing affiliations? If your organization has
an interest in keeping the Tor network working, please contact them about
supporting Tor. Without sponsors, Tor is going to become even slower.
</li>

<li>
If you can't help out with any of the above, you can still help out
individually by <a href="<page donate>">donating a bit of money to the
cause</a>. It adds up!
</li>

</ul>

<hr />

<a id="Funding"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#Funding">What would The Tor Project do with
more funding?</a></h3>

<p>
We have about 1500 relays right now, pushing over 150 MB/s average
traffic. We have several hundred thousand active users. But the Tor
network is not yet self-sustaining.
</p>

<p>
There are six main development/maintenance pushes that need attention:
</p>

<ul>

<li>
Scalability: We need to keep scaling and decentralizing the Tor
architecture so it can handle thousands of relays and millions of
users. The upcoming stable release is a major improvement, but there's
lots more to be done next in terms of keeping Tor fast and stable.
</li>

<li>
User support: With this many users, a lot of people are asking questions
all the time, offering to help out with things, and so on. We need good
clean docs, and we need to spend some effort coordinating volunteers.
</li>

<li>
Relay support: the Tor network is run by volunteers, but they still need
attention with prompt bug fixes, explanations when things go wrong,
reminders to upgrade, and so on. The network itself is a commons, and
somebody needs to spend some energy making sure the relay operators stay
happy. We also need to work on <a href="#RelayOS">stability</a> on some
platforms &mdash; e.g., Tor relays have problems on Win XP currently.
</li>

<li>
Usability: Beyond documentation, we also need to work on usability of the
software itself. This includes installers, clean GUIs, easy configuration
to interface with other applications, and generally automating all of
the difficult and confusing steps inside Tor. We've got a start on this
with the <a href="<page gui/index>">GUI Contest</a>, but much more work
remains &mdash; usability for privacy software has never been easy.
</li>

<li>
Incentives: We need to work on ways to encourage people to configure
their Tors as relays and exit nodes rather than just clients.
<a href="#EverybodyARelay">We need to make it easy to become a relay,
and we need to give people incentives to do it.</a>
</li>

<li>
Research: The anonymous communications field is full
of surprises and gotchas. In our copious free time, we
also help run top anonymity and privacy conferences like <a
href="http://petsymposium.org/">PETS</a>. We've identified a set of
critical <a href="<page volunteer>#Research">Tor research questions</a>
that will help us figure out how to make Tor secure against the variety of
attacks out there. Of course, there are more research questions waiting
behind these.
</li>

</ul>

<p>
We're continuing to move forward on all of these, but at this rate
<a href="#WhySlow">the Tor network is growing faster than the developers
can keep up</a>.
Now would be an excellent time to add a few more developers to the effort
so we can continue to grow the network.
</p>

<p>
We are also excited about tackling related problems, such as
censorship-resistance.
</p>

<p>
We are proud to have <a href="<page sponsors>">sponsorship and support</a>
from the Omidyar Network, the International Broadcasting Bureau, Bell
Security Solutions, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, several government
agencies and research groups, and hundreds of private contributors.
</p>

<p>
However, this support is not enough to keep Tor abreast of changes in the
Internet privacy landscape. Please <a href="<page donate>">donate</a>
to the project, or <a href="<page contact>">contact</a> our executive
director for information on making grants or major donations.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="HowUninstallTor"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#HowUninstallTor">How do I uninstall Tor?</a></h3>

<p>
This depends entirely on how you installed it and which operating system you
have. If you installed a package, then hopefully your package has a way to
uninstall itself. The Windows packages include uninstallers. The proper way to
completely remove Tor, Vidalia, Torbutton for Firefox, and Privoxy on any
version of Windows is as follows:
</p>

<ol>
<li>In your taskbar, right click on Privoxy (the blue icon with a white "P")
and choose exit.</li>
<li>In your taskbar, right click on Vidalia (the green onion or the black head)
and choose exit.</li>
<li>Right click on the taskbar to bring up TaskManager. Look for tor.exe in the
Process List. If it's running, right click and choose End Process.</li>
<li>Click the Start button, go to Programs, go to Vidalia, choose Uninstall.
This will remove the Vidalia bundle, which includes Tor and Privoxy.</li>
<li>Start Firefox. Go to the Tools menu, choose Add-ons. Select Torbutton.
Click the Uninstall button.</li>
</ol>

<p>
If you do not follow these steps (for example by trying to uninstall
Vidalia, Tor, and Privoxy while they are still running), you will need to
reboot and manually remove the directory "Program Files\Vidalia Bundle".
</p>

<p>
For Mac OS X, follow the <a
href="<page docs/tor-doc-osx>#uninstall">uninstall directions</a>.
</p>

<p>
If you installed by source, I'm afraid there is no easy uninstall method. But
on the bright side, by default it only installs into /usr/local/ and it should
be pretty easy to notice things there.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="PGPSigs"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#PGPSigs">What are these "sig" files on the
download page?</a></h3>

<p>
These are PGP signatures, so you can verify that the file you've downloaded is
exactly the one that we intended you to get.
</p>

<p>
Please read the <a
href="<page verifying-signatures>">verifying signatures</a> page for details.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="CompileTorWindows"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#CompileTorWindows">How do I compile Tor under
Windows?</a></h3>

<p>
Try following the steps at <a
href="<svnsandbox>doc/tor-win32-mingw-creation.txt"><svnsandbox>doc/tor-win32-mingw-creation.txt</a>.
</p>

<p>
(Note that you don't need to compile Tor yourself in order to use
it. Most people just use the packages available on the <a href="<page
download>">download page</a>.)
</p>

<hr />

<a id="VirusFalsePositives"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#VirusFalsePositives">Why does my Tor
executable appear to have a virus or spyware?</a></h3>

<p>
Sometimes, overzealous Windows virus and spyware detectors trigger on some
parts of the Tor Windows binary. Our best guess is that these are false
positives &mdash; after all, the anti-virus and anti-spyware business is just a
guessing game anyway. You should contact your vendor and explain that you have
a program that seems to be triggering false positives. Or pick a better vendor.
</p>

<p>
In the meantime, we encourage you to not just take our word for
it. Our job is to provide the source; if you're concerned, please do <a
href="#CompileTorWindows">recompile it yourself</a>.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="LiveCD"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#LiveCD">Is there a LiveCD or other bundle that
includes Tor?</a></h3>

<p>
There isn't any official LiveCD at this point. We're still trying to find good
solutions and trying to understand the security and anonymity implications of
the various options. In the mean time, feel free to check out the list below
and use your best judgement:
</p>

<p>
LiveCDs:
</p>

<ol>
<li><a href="http://incognito.anonymityanywhere.com/">Incognito LiveCD/USB</a>
is a CD you can boot that has several Internet applications (Firefox, IRC,
Mail, etc) pre-configured to use Tor. For most computers everything is
automatically configured and you're ready to go. You can even copy the CD to a
USB drive. Includes TorK.</li>
<li><a href="http://tork.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/LiveCD">TorK LiveCD</a>
is Knoppix-based with an emphasis on user-friendliness. You can work
anonymously or non-anonymously while TorK tries to keep you informed of the
consequences of your activity. The TorK LiveCD is experimental, so the aim is
to provide regular releases through 2007 and beyond.</li>
<li><a href="http://mandalka.name/privatix/">Privatix LiveCD/USB</a> is a
debian based live-system including tor, firefox and torbutton which can save
bookmarks and other settings or data on an encrypted usb-key</li>
</ol>

<p>
Windows bundles:
</p>

<ol>
<li><a href="<page torbrowser/index>">Tor Browser Bundle</a>
for Windows comes with a pre-configured web browser and is self contained
so you can run it from a USB stick.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.janusvm.com/tor_vm/">Tor VM</a> is a successor
to JanusVM. It needs testing from you!</li>
<li><a href="http://janusvm.com/">JanusVM</a> is a Linux kernel and software
running in VMWare that sits between your Windows computer and the Internet,
making sure that your Internet traffic is scrubbed and anonymized.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.xerobank.com/xB_browser.html">xB Browser</a>,
previously known as Torpark, is a Firefox+Tor package for Win32 that can
installed on a USB key. It needs a host Win32 operating system.</li>
</ol>

<p>
Not currently maintained as far as we know:
</p>

<ol>
<li>Polippix / Privatlivets Fred is a Danish Knoppix-based LiveCD with Tor
and utilities to encrypt IP-telephony. <a href="http://polippix.org/">Info and
download</a>.</li>
<li>ELE is a Linux LiveCD which is focused on privacy related
software. It includes Tor and you can download it at
<a
href="http://www.northernsecurity.net/download/ele/">http://www.northernsecurity.net/download/ele/</a>.</li>
<li>Virtual Privacy Machine is a Linux LiveCD that includes Firefox, Privoxy,
Tor, some IRC and IM applications, and a set of ipchains rules aimed to prevent
non-Tor traffic from accidentally leaving your computer. More information at
<a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/VirtualPrivacyMachine">https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/VirtualPrivacyMachine</a>.</li>
<li>Anonym.OS is a LiveCD similar to the above but is based on OpenBSD rather
than Linux for maximum security. It was designed to be anonymous and secure
from the ground up, and thus has some features and limitations not found in
other LiveCDs (Tor related or otherwise). You can obtain more information and
download Anonym.OS from <a
href="http://theory.kaos.to/projects.html">Kaos.Theory</a>.</li>
<li>Phantomix is a LiveCD for anonymous surfing and chatting based on the most
recent KNOPPIX release. It comes preconfigured with tor and privoxy. You can
get it from the <a href="http://phantomix.ytternhagen.de/">Phantomix
Website</a>.</li>
</ol>

<p>
Please contact us if you know any others.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="RelayFlexible"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#RelayFlexible">How stable does my relay
need to be?</a></h3>

<p>
We aim to make setting up a Tor relay easy and convenient:
</p>

<ul>
<li>Tor has built-in support for <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#LimitBandwidth">
rate
limiting</a>. Further, if you have a fast link
but want to limit the number of bytes per day
(or week or month) that you donate, check out the <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#Hibernation">hib
ernation
feature</a>.
</li>
<li>Each Tor relay has an <a
href="#ExitPolicies">exit
policy</a> that specifies what sort of outbound connections are allowed
or refused from that relay. If you are uncomfortable allowing people
to exit from your relay, you can set it up to only allow connections
to other Tor relays.
</li>
<li>It's fine if the relay goes offline sometimes. The directories
notice this quickly and stop advertising the relay. Just try to make
sure it's not too often, since connections using the relay when it
disconnects will break.
</li>
<li>We can handle relays with dynamic IPs just fine &mdash; simply
leave the Address config option blank, and Tor will try to guess.
</li>
<li>If your relay is behind a NAT and it doesn't know its public
IP (e.g. it has an IP of 192.168.x.y), you'll need to set up port
forwarding. Forwarding TCP connections is system dependent but <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#ServerForFirewal
ledClients">this
FAQ entry</a> offers some examples on how to do this.
</li>
<li>Your relay will passively estimate and advertise its recent
bandwidth capacity, so high-bandwidth relays will attract more users than
low-bandwidth ones. Therefore having low-bandwidth relays is useful too.
</li>
</ul>

<hr />

<a id="RunARelayBut"></a>
<a id="ExitPolicies"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#ExitPolicies">I'd run a relay, but I don't
want to deal with abuse issues.</a></h3>

<p>
Great. That's exactly why we implemented exit policies.
</p>

<p>
Each Tor relay has an exit policy that specifies what sort of
outbound connections are allowed or refused from that relay. The exit
policies are propagated to Tor clients via the directory, so clients
will automatically avoid picking exit relays that would refuse to
exit to their intended destination. This way each relay can decide
the services, hosts, and networks he wants to allow connections to,
based on abuse potential and his own situation. Read the FAQ entry on
<a href="<page faq-abuse>#TypicalAbuses">issues you might encounter
if you use the default exit policy</a>, and then read Mike Perry's <a
href="https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment">tips
for running an exit node with minimal harassment</a>.
</p>

<p>
The default exit policy allows access to
many popular services (e.g. web browsing), but <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#DefaultPorts">restricts</a>
some due to abuse potential (e.g. mail) and some since
the Tor network can't handle the load (e.g. default
file-sharing ports). You can change your exit policy
using Vidalia's "Sharing" tab, or by manually editing your <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#torrc">torrc</a>
file. If you want to avoid most if not all abuse potential, set it to
"reject *:*" (or un-check all the boxes in Vidalia). This setting means
that your relay will be used for relaying traffic inside the Tor network,
but not for connections to external websites or other services.
</p>

<p>
If you do allow any exit connections, make sure name resolution works
(that is, your computer can resolve Internet addresses correctly).
If there are any resources that your computer can't reach (for example,
you are behind a restrictive firewall or content filter), please
explicitly reject them in your exit policy &mdash; otherwise Tor users
will be impacted too.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="RelayOrBridge"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#RelayOrBridge">Should I be a normal relay
or bridge relay?</a></h3>

<p><a href="<page bridges>">Bridge relays</a> (or "bridges" for short)
are <a href="<page docs/tor-doc-relay>">Tor relays</a> that aren't listed
in the main Tor directory. That means
that even an ISP or government trying to filter connections to the Tor
network probably won't be able to block all the bridges.
</p>

<p>Being a normal relay vs being a bridge relay is almost the same
configuration: it's just a matter of whether your relay is listed
publically or not.
</p>

<p>Right now, there are roughly zero places in the world that filter
connections to the Tor network. So getting a lot of bridges running
right now is mostly a backup measure, a) in case the Tor network does
get blocked somewhere, and b) for people who want an extra layer of
security because they're worried somebody will recognize that it's a
public Tor relay IP address they're contacting.
</p>

<p>So should you run a normal relay or bridge relay? If you have
lots of bandwidth, you should definitely run a normal relay &mdash;
bridge relays see very little use these days. If you're willing to <a
href="#ExitPolicies">be an exit</a>, you should definitely run a normal
relay, since we need more exits. If you can't be an exit and only have
a little bit of bandwidth, then flip a coin. Thanks for volunteering!
</p>

<hr />

<a id="WhyNotNamed"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#WhyNotNamed">Why is my Tor relay not named?</a></h3>

<p>
We currently use these metrics to determine if your relay should be named:<br />
</p>
<ul>
<li>The name is not currently mapped to a different key. Existing mappings
are removed after 6 months of inactivity from a relay.</li>
<li>The relay must have been around for at least two weeks.</li>
<li>No other router may have wanted the same name in the past month.</li>
</ul>

<hr />

<a id="KeyManagement"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#KeyManagement">Tell me about all the keys
Tor uses.</a></h3>

<p>
Tor uses a variety of different keys, with three goals in mind: 1)
encryption to ensure privacy of data within the Tor network, 2)
authentication so clients know they're
talking to the relays they meant to talk to, and 3) signatures to make
sure all clients know the same set of relays.
</p>

<p>
<b>Encryption</b>: first, all connections in Tor use TLS link encryption,
so observers can't look inside to see which circuit a given cell is
intended for. Further, the Tor client establishes an ephemeral encryption
key with each relay in the circuit, so only the exit relay can read
the cells. Both sides discard the circuit key when the circuit ends,
so logging traffic and then breaking into the relay to discover the key
won't work.
</p>

<p>
<b>Authentication</b>:
Every Tor relay has a public decryption key called the "onion key".
When the Tor client establishes circuits, at each step it <a
href="<svnsandbox>doc/design-paper/tor-design.html#subsec:circuits">demands
that the Tor relay prove knowledge of its onion key</a>. That way
the first node in the path can't just spoof the rest of the path.
Each relay rotates its onion key once a week.
</p>

<p>
<b>Coordination</b>:
How do clients know what the relays are, and how do they know that they
have the right keys for them? Each relay has a long-term public signing
key called the "identity key". Each directory authority additionally has a
"directory signing key". The directory authorities <a
href="<svnsandbox>doc/spec/dir-spec.txt">provide a signed list</a>
of all the known relays, and in that list are a set of certificates from
each relay (self-signed by their identity key) specifying their keys,
locations, exit policies, and so on. So unless the adversary can control
a threshold of the directory authorities, he can't trick the Tor client
into using other Tor relays.
</p>

<p>
How do clients know what the directory authorities are? The Tor software
comes with a built-in list of location and public key for each directory
authority. So the only way to trick users into using a fake Tor network
is to give them a specially modified version of the software.
</p>

<p>
How do users know they've got the right software? When we distribute
the source code or a package, we digitally sign it with <a
href="http://www.gnupg.org/">GNU Privacy Guard</a>. See the <a
href="<page verifying-signatures>">instructions
on how to check Tor's signatures</a>.
</p>

<p>
In order to be certain that it's really signed by us, you need to have
met us in person and gotten a copy of our GPG key fingerprint, or you
need to know somebody who has. If you're concerned about an attack on
this level, we recommend you get involved with the security community
and start meeting people.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="EverybodyARelay"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#EverybodyARelay">You should make every Tor
user be a relay.</a></h3>

<p>
Requiring every Tor user to be a relay would help with scaling the
network to handle all our users, and <a href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#RelayAnonymity">running a Tor
relay may help your anonymity</a>. However, many Tor users cannot be good
relays &mdash; for example, some Tor clients operate from behind restrictive
firewalls, connect via modem, or otherwise aren't in a position where they
can relay traffic. Providing service to these clients is a critical
part of providing effective anonymity for everyone, since many Tor users
are subject to these or similar constraints and including these clients
increases the size of the anonymity set.
</p>

<p>
That said, we do want to encourage Tor users to run relays, so what we
really want to do is simplify the process of setting up and maintaining
a relay. We've made a lot of progress with easy configuration in the past
few years: Vidalia has an easy relay configuration interface, and supports
uPnP too. Tor is good at automatically detecting whether it's reachable and
how much bandwidth it can offer.
</p>

<p>
There are five steps we need to address before we can do this though:
</p>

<p>
First, we need to make Tor stable as a relay on all common
operating systems. The main remaining platform is Windows,
and we plan to finally address that in 2009. See Section 4.1 of <a
href="https://www.torproject.org/press/2008-12-19-roadmap-press-release">our
development roadmap</a>.
</p>

<p>
Second, we still need to get better at automatically estimating
the right amount of bandwidth to allow. See item #7 on the
<a href="<page volunteer>#Research">research section of the
volunteer page</a>: "Tor doesn't work very well when relays
have asymmetric bandwidth (e.g. cable or DSL)". It might be that <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#TransportIPnotTCP">switching
to UDP transport</a> is the simplest answer here &mdash; which alas is
not a very simple answer at all.
</p>

<p>
Third, we need to work on scalability, both of the network (how to
stop requiring that all Tor relays be able to connect to all Tor
relays) and of the directory (how to stop requiring that all Tor
users know about all Tor relays). Changes like this can have large
impact on potential and actual anonymity. See Section 5 of the <a
href="<svnsandbox>doc/design-paper/challenges.pdf">Challenges</a> paper
for details. Again, UDP transport would help here.
</p>

<p>
Fourth, we need to better understand the risks from
letting the attacker send traffic through your relay while
you're also initiating your own anonymized traffic. <a
href="http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#back01">Three</a> <a
href="http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#clog-the-queue">different</a>
<a href="http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#torta05">research</a> papers
describe ways to identify the relays in a circuit by running traffic
through candidate relays and looking for dips in the traffic while the
circuit is active. These clogging attacks are not that scary in the Tor
context so long as relays are never clients too. But if we're trying to
encourage more clients to turn on relay functionality too (whether as
<a href="<page bridges>">bridge relays</a> or as normal relays), then
we need to understand this threat better and learn how to mitigate it.
</p>

<p>
Fifth, we might need some sort of incentive scheme to encourage people
to relay traffic for others, and/or to become exit nodes. Here are our
<a href="https://blog.torproject.org/blog/two-incentive-designs-tor">current
thoughts on Tor incentives</a>.
</p>

<p>
Please help on all of these!
</p>

<hr />

<a id="Criminals"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#Criminals">Doesn't Tor enable criminals to do bad
things?</a></h3>

<p>
For the answer to this question and others, please see our <a
href="<page faq-abuse>">Tor Abuse FAQ</a>.
</p>

<hr />

<a id="RespondISP"></a>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="#RespondISP">How do I respond to my ISP about my
exit relay?</a></h3>

<p>
A collection of templates for successfully responding to ISPs is <a
href="https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorAbuseTemplates">collected
here</a>.
</p>

<hr />

</div>

#include <foot.wmi>

tor-webwml.git

declare the faq.wml page ready for translation. it will continue to change, but hopefully just by adding new entries, and not by throwing away the current ones.