git.schokokeks.org
Repositories
Help
Report an Issue
tor-webwml.git
Code
Commits
Branches
Tags
Suche
Strukturansicht:
6f421766c
Branches
Tags
bridges
docs-debian
jobs
master
press-clips
tor-webwml.git
projects
en
hidserv.wml
Add mid-August report. 1 minute early even.
Karsten Loesing
commited
6f421766c
at 2008-08-15 23:58:51
hidserv.wml
Blame
History
Raw
## translation metadata # Revision: $Revision$ # Translation-Priority: 3-low #include "head.wmi" TITLE="NLnet Project: Speed Up Tor Hidden Services" <div class="main-column"> <!-- PUT CONTENT AFTER THIS TAG --> <h2>NLnet Project: Speed Up Tor Hidden Services</h2> <hr /> <p> Tor Hidden Services allow users to set up anonymous information services, like websites, that can only be accessed through the Tor network and are protected against identification of the host that runs the services. The most critical limitations of Tor Hidden Services are the time it takes until a Hidden Service is registered in the network and the latency of contact establishment when accessed by a user. Due to design issues in the original Tor protocol, the connection to a new Hidden Service can take several minutes, which leads most users to give up before the connection has been established. Using Tor Hidden Services for direct interactive user-to-user communication (e.g. messaging) is nearly impossible due to the high latency of Hidden Service circuit setup. </p> <p> This project aims at speeding up Tor Hidden Services by improving the way Tor circuits are set up between the user and the Hidden Service as well as the way a Hidden Service is registered in the Tor network. In a first step precise diagnostics of the behavior of the Hidden Services in lab setups and real world situations will be conducted to find the root causes of the bad timing effects. Based on these diagnostics, optimization strategies will be designed and verified for unwanted implications for the security and anonymity of the Tor network. The most promising optimizations will then be implemented to achieve a notable improvement for the users. Precise success metrics will be developed in the diagnostics phase, after it becomes clear where the time is lost and what improvements are realistic. The ultimate goal is to have the Hidden Services protocol change production ready and propagated to the Tor users within a timeframe of less than 12 months. </p> <p> This project is generously funded by: </p> <p> <a href="http://www.nlnet.nl/news/2008/20080514-awards.html"> <img src="$(IMGROOT)/nlnet-160x60.png" alt="The NLnet foundation" /></a> </p> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3"> <thead> <tr> <th><big>Project</big></th> <th><big>Due Date</big></th> </tr> </thead> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> <b>Deliverable A:</b> Analysis, measurements and problem clarification<br /> <small><em>As Tor Hidden Services have not been actively developed further in the last year or so of Tor development, certain aspects of the problems are under-diagnosed. To identify the precise sources of latency and time loss, an extensive analysis of the deeper reasons for them needs to be conducted. Deliverable A will require about one month of work. The results of the analysis will influence the design decisions to be taken in Deliverable B.</em></small> </td> <td> June 15, 2008 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b>Deliverable B:</b> Design and evaluation of the necessary changes<br /> <small><em>The changes to Tor Hidden Services will affect core functionality of the protocol and therefore require a careful evaluation of possible repercussions for the security and anonymity. A two-month period is planned for the design and evaluation phase, which concludes with an extensive peer review.</em></small> </td> <td> August 15, 2008 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> <b>Deliverable C:</b> Implementation<br /> <small><em>After design, evaluation and peer review the modifications need to be implemented and integrated with the current Tor code base. The actual implementation of the necessary changes will take approximately two months.</em></small> </td> <td> October 15, 2008 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b>Deliverable D:</b> Implementation and test of the change up to release state<br /> <small><em>The modification is highly critical to the security and anonymity of the Tor network, it requires extensive testing and debugging in laboratory and real life conditions. A period of three months is projected for testing and debugging, where the responsible developer is committed to the testing effort with 1/3 of its time. Part of the testing phase will be a public beta period.</em></small> </td> <td> January 15, 2009 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> <b>Deliverable E:</b> Rollout<br /> <small><em>The actual rollout to the Tor server network will be conducted in sync with the regular Tor release schedule. As this schedule is dependent on a number of external factors, like the completion of other software projects that should go into the same release, the actual release time and the time until this release has been accepted and installed by most Tor server operators can vary. From experience a period of three to four months can be expected.</em></small> </td> <td> May 15, 2009 </td> </tr> </table> <br /> <a id="Reports"></a> <h2><a class="anchor" href="#Reports">Monthly Status Reports</a></h2> <p> There will be in total eight monthly status reports beginning with the first deliverable on June 15, 2008 and ending with completion of implementation and testing work on January 15, 2009. </p> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3"> <thead> <tr> <th><big>Month,</big></th> <th><big>Status Report</big></th> </tr> </thead> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> <a id="Jun08"></a> <a class="anchor" href="#Jun08">Jun 08</a> </td> <td> <small><em>The original goal of analyzing the problems that lead to slowdown of Tor Hidden Services has been accomplished. Part of this analysis was measuring the delay that a user experiences when setting up or accessing a hidden service. Furthermore, measurement data from April 2008 could be leveraged to explore timings of internal substeps of establishing a connection to a hidden service. The results of this analysis are contained in a 22-page <a href="http://freehaven.net/~karsten/hidserv/perfanalysis-2008-06-15.pdf">report</a> that has been made public on the Tor <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jun-2008/msg00019.html">developer mailing list</a>.</em></small> <br/> <small><em>The analysis also unveiled a few bugs which were responsible for part of the delay in making a hidden service available for clients. Some bugs have been fixed subsequent to the analysis, others will be fixed soon. The evaluation has further brought up several possible approaches to improve Tor Hidden Service performance. Some of these ideas can be applied immediately, while others require deeper analysis and new measurements. Finally, in the course of the analysis, we discovered that some improvements require more in-depth changes to Tor which are not directly related to hidden services. These changes cannot be achieved in the time frame of this project.</em></small> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <a id="Jul08"></a> <a class="anchor" href="#Jul08">Jul 08</a> </td> <td> <small><em>All bugs that have been found in the analysis have been fixed. This includes the 2 bugs that have already been fixed during the analysis and 4 more bugs that were fixed within the past 30 days. While the bugfixes remove unintended performance bottlenecks due to programming errors, some of the design changes that have been spotted in the previous analysis have side-effects on anonymity or overall network load which need to be evaluated against individual performance gains. A <a href="http://freehaven.net/~karsten/hidserv/discussion-2008-07-15.pdf">report</a> has been published to the <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jul-2008/msg00034.html">developer mailing list</a> including 7 possible design changes that need to be discussed. Some evaluations (namely Low-Bandwidth Measurements and the Grand Scaling Plan) have turned out to require more time than expected and had to be scheduled for a later time in the project than deliverable B. The current plan is to perform these evaluations within the timeframe until January 15 and work with assumptions until final results are available.</em></small> </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> Aug 08 </td> <td> <small><em>During the past 30 days the 7 proposed designs have been further evaluated and discussed. Four of them have proven to be applicable in terms of the required changes to the code and possible anonymity implications. One has been classified as bug rather than design change. Two had to be excluded for either unforeseeable security problems, or uncertainty of actual performance improvements.</em></small> <br/> <small><em>Together with the results from July 15, the design phase has been concluded. The tasks for the upcoming implementation phase are now quite clear: One bug needs to be fixed and four design changes need to be implemented. Further, evaluations of the changed design need to be performed in order to verify their usefulness. A <a href="http://freehaven.net/~karsten/hidserv/design-2008-08-15.pdf">report</a> with the results of the design phase has been published to the <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Aug-2008/msg00025.html">developer mailing list</a>.</em></small> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Sep 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> Oct 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Nov 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> Dec 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Jan 09 </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> <br /> <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to do? :) <a id="People"></a> <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2> <ul> <li><a href="<page people>#Core">Karsten Loesing</a></li> <li><a href="<page people>#Core">Steven Murdoch</a></li> </ul> --> <a id="Links"></a> <h2><a class="anchor" href="#Links">Links</a></h2> <ul> <li>Research paper on <b>Performance Measurements and Statistics of Tor Hidden Services</b> (<a href="http://www.uni-bamberg.de/fileadmin/uni/fakultaeten/wiai_lehrstuehle/praktische_informatik/Dateien/Publikationen/loesing2008performance.pdf">PDF</a>) by Karsten Loesing, Werner Sandmann, Christian Wilms, and Guido Wirtz. In the Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT), Turku, Finland, July 2008. <!-- In the future, put links to proposal, preliminary results, etc. here --> </ul> </div><!-- #main --> #include <foot.wmi>