git.schokokeks.org
Repositories
Help
Report an Issue
tor-webwml.git
Code
Commits
Branches
Tags
Suche
Strukturansicht:
dfabcfb79
Branches
Tags
bridges
docs-debian
jobs
master
press-clips
tor-webwml.git
projects
en
lowbandwidth.wml
a few more fixes
Roger Dingledine
commited
dfabcfb79
at 2008-06-17 04:07:17
lowbandwidth.wml
Blame
History
Raw
## translation metadata # Revision: $Revision: 14486 $ # Translation-Priority: 3-low #include "head.wmi" TITLE="NLnet Project: Tor for Low Bandwidth Clients" <div class="main-column"> <!-- PUT CONTENT AFTER THIS TAG --> <h2>NLnet Project: Tor for Low Bandwidth Clients</h2> <hr /> <p> The Tor anonymity system is currently only usable by internet users who have high-bandwidth connections. Upon the start of the Tor client, a large file with all Tor server descriptions is being downloaded. This file is the so-called Tor Directory and enables the client to choose from the available mix-servers in the Tor network. The download of the full Tor Directory is required by the current Tor protocol. This directory file is too large for users on modem lines or on mobile data networks like GPRS as the initial download that is triggered every time an user logs in takes 10 to 30 minutes over a slow line. As a result, Tor is not usable by modem and mobile users. One of the major goals of the Tor project is to provide secure anonymous internet access to users in dictatorships and repressive states. These locations often have very slow internet connections, either by modem or due to low-bandwidth links to the outside world. By enabling these users to use the Tor network, significant progress can be made towards free communication and information in these countries. </p> <p> To make Tor usable also for users on low-bandwidth connections, an evolution of the Tor protocol is needed to reduce the initial download size. This new Tor protocol version should change the way a client receives the information for its Tor circuit setup in a way, that the initial download can be performed over a 14.4 kbps modem line in about three minutes. The work to be conducted under the proposal has the ultimate goal of getting the protocol change production ready and propagated to the Tor users within a timeframe of less then 12 months. The resulting software will be published under the 3-Clause BSD license, as all of the Tor code. All deliverables will be fully public. </p> <p> This project is generously funded by: </p> <p> <a href="http://www.nlnet.nl/news/2008/20080514-awards.html"> <img src="$(IMGROOT)/nlnet-160x60.png" alt="The NLnet foundation" /></a> </p> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3"> <thead> <tr> <th><big>Project</big></th> <th><big>Due Date</big></th> </tr> </thead> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> <b>Deliverable A:</b> Design and evaluation of the protocol change<br /> <small><em>This deliverable covers the detailed design and simulation-based evaluation of the necessary changes and design modifications to the current Tor protocol. The changes in protocol will be relatively substantial, so it requires a careful evaluation of possible repercussions for the security and anonymity of the Tor network. A two-month period is planned for this design and evaluation phase, which concludes with an extensive peer review. Part of Deliverable A will be a goal definition for performance for the implementation phase. The design goal is to shrink the Tor Directory size that needs to be downloaded to about 300 Kilobytes, which would enable an user on a 14.4 kbps line to download it in roughly three minutes. There may be deviations from this design goal if required to maintain anonymity and security, but this is the figure to aim for. <em></small> </td> <td> July 15, 2008 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b>Deliverable B:</b>Implementation of protocol change<br /> <small><em>After design, evaluation and peer review the modifications need to be implemented and integrated with the current Tor code base. The actual implementation of the necessary changes will take approximately three months. </em></small> </td> <td> October 15, 2008 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> <b>Deliverable C:</b>Testing<br /> <small><em>Since the modification is highly critical to the security and anonymity of the Tor network, it requires extensive testing and debugging in laboratory and real life conditions. A period of three months is projected for testing and debugging, where the responsible developer is committed to the testing effort with 1/3 of its time. Part of the testing phase will be a public beta period. </em></small> </td> <td> November 15, 2008 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <b>Deliverable D:</b>Rollout<br /> <small><em>The actual rollout to the Tor server network will be conducted in sync with the regular Tor release schedule. As this schedule is dependent on a number of external factors, like the completion of other software projects that should go into the same release, the actual release time and the time until this release has been accepted and installed by most Tor server operators can vary. From experience a period of three to four months can be expected. The rollout will be conducted as part of the regular Tor release process that is a persistent activity done by volunteers and by personal paid through other grants to the Tor project. </em></small> </td> <td> February 15, 2009 </td> </tr> </table> <br /> <a id="Reports"></a> <h2><a class="anchor" href="#Reports">Monthly Status Reports</a></h2> <p> There will be in total eight monthly status reports beginning with the first deliverable on July 15, 2008 and ending with completion of implementation and testing work on February 15, 2009. </p> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3"> <thead> <tr> <th><big>Month,</big></th> <th><big>Status Report</big></th> </tr> </thead> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> <a id="Jun08"></a> <a class="anchor" href="#Jun08">Jun 08</a> </td> <td> <small><em>We did some initial measuring of Tor clients bootstrapping. The results are not very surprising: a client fetches about 10KB of certs, one consensus for 140KB (now 90KB, see next paragraph), and about 1.5 megs of Server Descriptors (after half of which it starts building circuits).</small></em> <br /> <small><em><a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/138-remove-down-routers-from-consensus.txt">Proposal 138</a> shrinks consensus documents by 30% to 40% and has already been implemented and merged into the spec. Implementation is part of the 0.2.1.x-alpha tree and the code will take effect once over two-thirds of the directory authorities (i.e. 5 out of 6) have upgraded.</small></em> <br /> <small><em><a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/140-consensus-diffs.txt">Proposal 140</a> does not directly relate to reducing initial download size, but instead tries to make subsequent downloads of new consensus documents use fewer bytes has also been written up and <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jun-2008/msg00013.html">sent to or-dev</a>. There are some questions to be answered from other Tor developers first, but other than that I think it's fine and could be implemented.</small></em> <br /> <small><em>The Big Thing is making clients not download all 1.5 megs of server descriptors. <a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/141-jit-sd-downloads.txt">Proposal 141</a> has been <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jun-2008/msg00017.html">sent to or-dev</a>. There are basically 3 things to it, as far as I can see at the moment: move load balancing info into the consensus (should not be hard), implement something so that Tor clients can fetch SDs on demand from routers along their circuit while they are buliding it (described in the draft), and deal with exit selection. We're still developing ideas for the last part; some possibilities are mentioned in the draft.</small></em> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Jul 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> Aug 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Sep 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> Oct 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Nov 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#e5e5e5"> <td> Dec 08 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Jan 09 </td> <td> </td> </tr> </table> <br /> <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what these people will be doing? And---what exactly are these people going to do? :) <a id="People"></a> <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2> <ul> <li><a href="<page people>#Core">Peter Palfrader</a></li> </ul> --> <!-- In the future, put links to proposal, preliminary results, etc. here --> </div><!-- #main --> #include <foot.wmi>