tighten some of the tor-legal-faq language.
Roger Dingledine

Roger Dingledine commited on 2005-02-19 23:06:20
Zeige 1 geänderte Dateien mit 7 Einfügungen und 3 Löschungen.

... ...
@@ -66,8 +66,9 @@ it may be out of date. Follow the link to get the latest version.</p>
66 66
 
67 67
 <h2>Has anyone ever been sued for running Tor?</h2>
68 68
 
69
-<p><strong>No.</strong> Further, we believe that running a Tor node is
70
-lawful under U.S. law.</p>
69
+<p><strong>No.</strong> Further, we believe that running a Tor node,
70
+including a Tor exit node that allows people to anonymously send and
71
+receive traffic, is lawful under U.S. law.</p>
71 72
 
72 73
 
73 74
 <h2>Should I use Tor, or encourage the use of Tor, for illegal purposes
... ...
@@ -93,7 +94,10 @@ server?</h2>
93 94
 and Tor is no exception to the rule. Presently, no court has ever considered any
94 95
 case involving the Tor technology, and we therefore cannot guarantee
95 96
 that you will never face any legal liability as a result of running a
96
-Tor server.</p>
97
+Tor server. However, we believe so strongly that you shouldn't be liable
98
+for traffic that passes through your Tor server that we're running our
99
+own Tor server.
100
+</p>
97 101
 
98 102
 
99 103
 <h2>Will EFF represent me if I get in trouble for running a Tor
100 104