Fix two bad links caught by IanG.
Andrew Lewman

Andrew Lewman commited on 2008-01-10 15:21:22
Zeige 1 geänderte Dateien mit 2 Einfügungen und 6 Löschungen.

... ...
@@ -3,10 +3,6 @@
3 3
 
4 4
 #include "head.wmi" TITLE="Who uses Tor?" CHARSET="UTF-8"
5 5
 
6
-# Note to translators: this file is still under construction, and
7
-# will probably change a whole lot before we link to it. So it's
8
-# probably best to not translate it yet.
9
-
10 6
 <div class="main-column">
11 7
 <h1>Who uses Tor?</h1>
12 8
 <ul>
... ...
@@ -281,7 +277,7 @@ we recommend using Tor.
281 277
 <p>
282 278
 Please do send us your success stories. They are very important because
283 279
 Tor provides anonymity. While it is thrilling speculate about <a
284
-href="<page contact>">undesired effects of Tor</a>, when it succeeds, nobody notices.  This is
280
+href="<page faq-abuse>">undesired effects of Tor</a>, when it succeeds, nobody notices.  This is
285 281
 great for users, but not so good for us, since publishing success
286 282
 stories about how people or organizations are staying anonymous could be
287 283
 counterproductive.  For example, we talked to an FBI officer who
... ...
@@ -297,7 +293,7 @@ just a good idea some of the time - it is a requirement for a free and functioni
297 293
 <a href="http://www.texasbar.com/Content/ContentGroups/Public_Information1/Legal_Resources_Consumer_Information/Family_Law1/Adoption_Options.htm#sect2">adoption services</a>,
298 294
 <a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/aronson/20020827.html">police officer identities</a>,
299 295
 and so forth. It would be impossible to rehash the entire anonymity debate here - it is too large an issue with too many nuances, and there
300
-are plenty of other places where this information can be found. We do have a <a href="page faq-abuse">Tor abuse</a> page describing some of
296
+are plenty of other places where this information can be found. We do have a <a href="<page faq-abuse>">Tor abuse</a> page describing some of
301 297
 the possible abuse cases for Tor, but suffice it to say that if you want to abuse the system, you'll either find it mostly closed for your
302 298
 purposes (e.g. the majority of Tor relays do not support SMTP in order to prevent anonymous email spamming), or if you're one of the
303 299
 <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/12/computer_crime_1.html">Four Horsemen of the Information Apocalypse</a>,
304 300