fix the odd character encodings. (144ec82a2) - tor-webwml.git

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ href="https://www.eff.org">EFF</a>). Last updated May 31, 2011.</p>
 <p>Note to Tor relay operators: In this litigious era, anyone providing
 routing services may face copyright complaints for transmitted content.
 Fortunately, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act safe harbors should
-provide protections from many of them�both to you and to your upstream
+provide protections from many of them both to you and to your upstream
 provider. If your Internet host forwards a DMCA copyright complaint to
 you, you can use this template to write a response, though you will need
 to customize it to your situation. Please also ensure all the statements
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ misunderstandings about the law and about some of the software I
 run.</p>
 <p>As you know, the DMCA creates four "safe harbors" for service
 providers to protect them from copyright liability for the acts of their
-users, when the ISPs fulfill certain requirements. (17 U.S.C. � 512) The
+users, when the ISPs fulfill certain requirements. (17 U.S.C. &sect; 512) The
 DMCA's requirements vary depending on the ISP's role. You may be
 familiar with the "notice and takedown" provisions of section 512(c) of
 the DMCA; however, those do not apply when an ISP merely acts as a
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ free from fear of copyright damages.</p>
 terminates subscribers who are repeat infringers. The notification you
 received is certainly not proof of the "repeat infringement" that is
 required under the law before you need to terminate my account. In fact,
-it�s not even proof of any copyright infringement; a notice claiming
+it's not even proof of any copyright infringement; a notice claiming
 infringement is not the same as a determination of infringement. I have
 not infringed any copyrights and do not intend to do so. Therefore, you
 should continue to be protected under the DMCA 512(a) safe harbor


...	...	@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ href="https://www.eff.org">EFF</a>). Last updated May 31, 2011.</p>
14	14	<p>Note to Tor relay operators: In this litigious era, anyone providing
15	15	routing services may face copyright complaints for transmitted content.
16	16	Fortunately, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act safe harbors should
17		-provide protections from many of them�both to you and to your upstream
	17	+provide protections from many of them both to you and to your upstream
18	18	provider. If your Internet host forwards a DMCA copyright complaint to
19	19	you, you can use this template to write a response, though you will need
20	20	to customize it to your situation. Please also ensure all the statements
...	...	@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ misunderstandings about the law and about some of the software I
56	56	run.</p>
57	57	<p>As you know, the DMCA creates four "safe harbors" for service
58	58	providers to protect them from copyright liability for the acts of their
59		-users, when the ISPs fulfill certain requirements. (17 U.S.C. � 512) The
	59	+users, when the ISPs fulfill certain requirements. (17 U.S.C. § 512) The
60	60	DMCA's requirements vary depending on the ISP's role. You may be
61	61	familiar with the "notice and takedown" provisions of section 512(c) of
62	62	the DMCA; however, those do not apply when an ISP merely acts as a
...	...	@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ free from fear of copyright damages.</p>
80	80	terminates subscribers who are repeat infringers. The notification you
81	81	received is certainly not proof of the "repeat infringement" that is
82	82	required under the law before you need to terminate my account. In fact,
83		-it�s not even proof of any copyright infringement; a notice claiming
	83	+it's not even proof of any copyright infringement; a notice claiming
84	84	infringement is not the same as a determination of infringement. I have
85	85	not infringed any copyrights and do not intend to do so. Therefore, you
86	86	should continue to be protected under the DMCA 512(a) safe harbor
87	87