fix the odd character encodings.
Andrew Lewman

Andrew Lewman commited on 2011-09-16 04:32:04
Zeige 1 geänderte Dateien mit 3 Einfügungen und 3 Löschungen.

... ...
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ href="https://www.eff.org">EFF</a>). Last updated May 31, 2011.</p>
14 14
 <p>Note to Tor relay operators: In this litigious era, anyone providing
15 15
 routing services may face copyright complaints for transmitted content.
16 16
 Fortunately, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act safe harbors should
17
-provide protections from many of them�both to you and to your upstream
17
+provide protections from many of them both to you and to your upstream
18 18
 provider. If your Internet host forwards a DMCA copyright complaint to
19 19
 you, you can use this template to write a response, though you will need
20 20
 to customize it to your situation. Please also ensure all the statements
... ...
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ misunderstandings about the law and about some of the software I
56 56
 run.</p>
57 57
 <p>As you know, the DMCA creates four "safe harbors" for service
58 58
 providers to protect them from copyright liability for the acts of their
59
-users, when the ISPs fulfill certain requirements. (17 U.S.C. � 512) The
59
+users, when the ISPs fulfill certain requirements. (17 U.S.C. &sect; 512) The
60 60
 DMCA's requirements vary depending on the ISP's role. You may be
61 61
 familiar with the "notice and takedown" provisions of section 512(c) of
62 62
 the DMCA; however, those do not apply when an ISP merely acts as a
... ...
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ free from fear of copyright damages.</p>
80 80
 terminates subscribers who are repeat infringers. The notification you
81 81
 received is certainly not proof of the "repeat infringement" that is
82 82
 required under the law before you need to terminate my account. In fact,
83
-it�s not even proof of any copyright infringement; a notice claiming
83
+it's not even proof of any copyright infringement; a notice claiming
84 84
 infringement is not the same as a determination of infringement. I have
85 85
 not infringed any copyrights and do not intend to do so. Therefore, you
86 86
 should continue to be protected under the DMCA 512(a) safe harbor
87 87