nick did the openssl aes thing. woot. (2b576f66c) - tor-webwml.git

volunteer.html

@@ -184,10 +184,6 @@ abandoned. Are any of them stable, fast, clean, and free software? If so
 (or if we can make that so), we should integrate them into Tor. See <a
 href="http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Sep-2005/msg00001.html">Agl's
 post</a> for one potential approach.</li>
-<li>Currently Tor ships with its own AES, since when we started OpenSSL
-had missing/broken AES support. But now that it's gotten more mainstream,
-we should change things so we only use our bundled AES if OpenSSL doesn't
-support it natively.</li>
 <li>Tor 0.1.1.x includes support for hardware crypto accelerators via
 OpenSSL. Nobody has ever tested it, though. Does somebody want to get
 a card and let us know how it goes?</li>


...	...	@@ -184,10 +184,6 @@ abandoned. Are any of them stable, fast, clean, and free software? If so
184	184	(or if we can make that so), we should integrate them into Tor. See <a
185	185	href="http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Sep-2005/msg00001.html">Agl's
186	186	post</a> for one potential approach.</li>
187		-<li>Currently Tor ships with its own AES, since when we started OpenSSL
188		-had missing/broken AES support. But now that it's gotten more mainstream,
189		-we should change things so we only use our bundled AES if OpenSSL doesn't
190		-support it natively.</li>
191	187	<li>Tor 0.1.1.x includes support for hardware crypto accelerators via
192	188	OpenSSL. Nobody has ever tested it, though. Does somebody want to get
193	189	a card and let us know how it goes?</li>
194	190