Browse code

Update abuse faq to be a bit more honest

Sebastian Hahn authored on 30/03/2016 00:23:20
Showing 1 changed files
... ...
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ using technology?</a></li>
56 56
     don't have the time or money to spend figuring out how to get
57 57
     privacy online. This is the worst of all possible worlds. </p>
58 58
 
59
-    <p>So yes, criminals could in theory use Tor, but they already have
59
+    <p>So yes, criminals can use Tor, but they already have
60 60
     better options, and it seems unlikely that taking Tor away from the
61 61
     world will stop them from doing their bad things. At the same time, Tor
62 62
     and other privacy measures can <em>fight</em> identity theft, physical
... ...
@@ -171,29 +171,9 @@ using technology?</a></li>
171 171
     <p>You might also find that your Tor relay's IP is blocked from accessing
172 172
     some Internet sites/services. This might happen regardless of your exit
173 173
     policy, because some groups don't seem to know or care that Tor has
174
-    exit policies. (If you have a spare IP not used for other activities,
175
-    you might consider running your Tor relay on it.) For example, </p>
176
-
177
-    <ul>
178
-    <li>Because of a few cases of anonymous jerks messing with its web
179
-    pages, Wikipedia is currently blocking many Tor relay IPs from writing
180
-    (reading still works). We're talking to Wikipedia about how they might
181
-    control abuse while still providing access to anonymous contributors,
182
-    who often have hot news or inside info on a topic but don't want to risk
183
-    revealing their identities when publishing it (or don't want to reveal
184
-    to local observers that they're accessing Wikipedia). Slashdot is also
185
-    in the same boat.</li>
186
-
187
-    <li>SORBS is putting some Tor relay IPs on their email
188
-    blacklist as well. They do this because they passively detect whether your
189
-    relay connects to certain IRC networks, and they conclude from this that
190
-    your relay is capable of spamming. We tried to work with
191
-    them to teach them that not all software works this way,
192
-    but we have given up. We recommend you avoid them, and <a
193
-    href="http://paulgraham.com/spamhausblacklist.html">teach your friends
194
-    (if they use them) to avoid abusive blacklists too</a>.</li>
195
-
196
-    </ul>
174
+    exit policies. (If you have a spare IP not used for other activities, you
175
+    might consider running your Tor relay on it.) In general, it's advisable
176
+    not to use your home internet connection to provide a Tor relay.</p>
197 177
 
198 178
     <a id="IrcBans"></a>
199 179
     <h3><a class="anchor" href="#IrcBans">Tor is banned from the IRC network I want to use.</a></h3>