Roger Dingledine commited on 2006-09-22 20:26:05
Zeige 1 geänderte Dateien mit 6 Einfügungen und 2 Löschungen.
| ... | ... |
@@ -261,14 +261,18 @@ coming from Tor nodes as "anonymous users," removing the ability of the |
| 261 | 261 |
abusers to blend in, the abusers moved back to using their open proxies |
| 262 | 262 |
and bot networks. </p> |
| 263 | 263 |
|
| 264 |
-<p>Second, consider that thousands of people use Tor every day simply for |
|
| 264 |
+<p>Second, consider that hundreds of thousands of people use Tor every |
|
| 265 |
+day simply for |
|
| 265 | 266 |
good data hygiene — for example, to protect against data-gathering |
| 266 | 267 |
advertising companies while going about their normal activities. Others |
| 267 | 268 |
use Tor because it's their only way to get past restrictive local |
| 268 | 269 |
firewalls. Some Tor users may be legitimately connecting |
| 269 | 270 |
to your service right now to carry on normal activities. You need to |
| 270 | 271 |
decide whether banning the Tor network is worth losing the contributions |
| 271 |
-of these users, as well as potential future legitimate users. </p> |
|
| 272 |
+of these users, as well as potential future legitimate users. (Often |
|
| 273 |
+people don't have a good measure of how many polite Tor users are |
|
| 274 |
+connecting to their service — you never notice them until there's |
|
| 275 |
+an impolite one.)</p> |
|
| 272 | 276 |
|
| 273 | 277 |
<p>At this point, you should also ask yourself what you do about other |
| 274 | 278 |
services that aggregate many users behind a few IP addresses. Tor is |
| 275 | 279 |