tor-webwml.git

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ letting her opt to migrate from one major Tor version to the next.

 <br />

 <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what

-these people will be doing? And---what exactly are these people going to

+these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to

 do? :)

 <a id="People"></a>

 <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2>

@@ -85,8 +85,6 @@ do? :)

 </ul>

 -->

-</ul>

-

 </div><!-- #main -->

 #include <foot.wmi>

@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ implementation and testing work on January 15, 2009.

     <a href="http://freehaven.net/~karsten/hidserv/perfanalysis-2008-06-15.pdf">report</a>

     that has been made public on the Tor

     <a href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jun-2008/msg00019.html">developer

-    mailing list</a>.</small></em>

+    mailing list</a>.</em></small>

     <br/>

     <small><em>The analysis also unveiled a few bugs which were responsible

     for part of the delay in making a hidden service available for

@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ implementation and testing work on January 15, 2009.

     we discovered that some improvements require more in-depth

     changes to Tor which are not directly related to hidden services. These

     changes cannot be achieved in the time frame of this

-    project.</small></em>

+    project.</em></small>

   </td>

 </tr>

@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ implementation and testing work on January 15, 2009.

 <br />

 <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what

-these people will be doing? And---what exactly are these people going to

+these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to

 do? :)

 <a id="People"></a>

 <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2>

@@ -152,14 +152,14 @@ implementation and testing work on February 15, 2009.

     bootstrapping. The results are not very surprising: a client

     fetches about 10KB of certs, one consensus for 140KB (now 90KB, see

     next paragraph), and about 1.5 megs of Server Descriptors (after

-    half of which it starts building circuits).</small></em>

+    half of which it starts building circuits).</em></small>

     <br />

     <small><em><a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/138-remove-down-routers-from-consensus.txt">Proposal

     138</a> shrinks consensus documents by 30% to

     40% and has already been implemented and merged into the spec.

     Implementation is part of the 0.2.1.x-alpha tree and the code will

     take effect once over two-thirds of the directory authorities

-    (i.e. 5 out of 6) have upgraded.</small></em>

+    (i.e. 5 out of 6) have upgraded.</em></small>

     <br />

     <small><em><a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/140-consensus-diffs.txt">Proposal

     140</a> does not directly relate to reducing initial download size,

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ implementation and testing work on February 15, 2009.

     href="http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jun-2008/msg00013.html">sent to

     or-dev</a>. There are some questions to be answered from other Tor

     developers first, but other than that I think it's fine and could

-    be implemented.</small></em>

+    be implemented.</em></small>

     <br />

     <small><em>The Big Thing is making clients not download all 1.5 megs

     of server descriptors. <a href="https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/141-jit-sd-downloads.txt">Proposal

@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ implementation and testing work on February 15, 2009.

     clients can fetch SDs on demand from routers along their circuit

     while they are building it (described in the draft), and deal with

     exit selection. We're still developing ideas for the last part;

-    some possibilities are mentioned in the draft.</small></em>

+    some possibilities are mentioned in the draft.</em></small>

   </td>

 </tr>

@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ implementation and testing work on February 15, 2009.

 <br />

 <!-- Do we want a people section? If so, would it make sense to write what

-these people will be doing? And---what exactly are these people going to

+these people will be doing? And what exactly are these people going to

 do? :)

 <a id="People"></a>

 <h2><a class="anchor" href="#People">People</a></h2>