Adding application prereqs for Tor project ideas
Damian Johnson

Damian Johnson commited on 2013-03-19 18:15:17
Zeige 1 geänderte Dateien mit 19 Einfügungen und 0 Löschungen.


Spoke with Nick and got both confirmation that they're still relevant and 
prereqs for applying. Hopefully this'll ensure a decent quality for 
applications and warn away students for whom it's a bad idea.


... ...
@@ -914,6 +914,12 @@ meetings around the world.</li>
914 914
     href="https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/proposals/203-https-frontend.txt">Proposal
915 915
     203</a> has a general design sketch.
916 916
     </p>
917
+
918
+    <p>
919
+    <b>This project is likely trickier than it looks. You should avoid applying
920
+    for this if you're uncertain about being able to complete it.</b>
921
+    </p>
922
+    </li>
917 923
     </li>
918 924
 
919 925
     <a id="chutneyExpansion"></a>
... ...
@@ -937,6 +943,12 @@ meetings around the world.</li>
937 943
     built to the point where we could use Chutney to exercise various Tor
938 944
     features as an automated integration test.
939 945
     </p>
946
+
947
+    <p>
948
+    <b>As part of your application for this project please submit a patch that
949
+    expands Chutney.</b>
950
+    </p>
951
+
940 952
     </li>
941 953
 
942 954
     <a id="limitCapabilities"></a>
... ...
@@ -1129,6 +1141,13 @@ meetings around the world.</li>
1129 1141
     operations, directory service -- and refactor its interface completely, to
1130 1142
     minify and codify its points of contact with the rest of Tor.
1131 1143
     </p>
1144
+
1145
+    <p>
1146
+    <b>As part of your application for this project please identify one of the
1147
+    thorniest Tor functions and submit a patch refactoring it to be better. If
1148
+    you find this to be difficult then this likely isn't the project for
1149
+    you.</b>
1150
+    </p>
1132 1151
     </li>
1133 1152
 
1134 1153
     <li>
1135 1154