Roger Dingledine commited on 2006-02-14 05:35:20
Zeige 1 geänderte Dateien mit 11 Einfügungen und 3 Löschungen.
... | ... |
@@ -22,6 +22,17 @@ services. Get them to tell their friends.</li> |
22 | 22 |
security, let them know about us.</li> |
23 | 23 |
</ol> |
24 | 24 |
|
25 |
+<a id="Bugs"></a> |
|
26 |
+<h2><a class="anchor" href="#Bugs">Critical bugs</a></h2> |
|
27 |
+<ol> |
|
28 |
+<li>Tor servers are not stable on Windows XP currently, |
|
29 |
+because we try to use hundreds of sockets, and the |
|
30 |
+Windows kernel doesn't seem capable of handling this. <a |
|
31 |
+href="http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/WindowsBufferProblems">Please |
|
32 |
+help us solve this!</a> It is the number one problem with growing |
|
33 |
+the Tor network currently.</li> |
|
34 |
+</ol> |
|
35 |
+ |
|
25 | 36 |
<a id="Installers"></a> |
26 | 37 |
<h2><a class="anchor" href="#Installers">Installers</a></h2> |
27 | 38 |
<ol> |
... | ... |
@@ -152,9 +163,6 @@ post</a> for one potential approach. Also see |
152 | 163 |
<li>Tor 0.1.1.x includes support for hardware crypto accelerators via |
153 | 164 |
OpenSSL. Nobody has ever tested it, though. Does somebody want to get |
154 | 165 |
a card and let us know how it goes?</li> |
155 |
-<li>Long ago, we added dmalloc support to Tor, to track leaks. But we |
|
156 |
-never quite got it working. Is dmalloc unfit for the job? Look at the |
|
157 |
---with-dmalloc configure option and go from there.</li> |
|
158 | 166 |
<li>Because Tor servers need to store-and-forward each cell they handle, |
159 | 167 |
high-bandwidth Tor servers end up using dozens of megabytes of memory |
160 | 168 |
just for buffers. We need better heuristics for when to shrink/expand |
161 | 169 |